This site organizes public court records, sworn filings, and a growing group of individuals who allege they were defrauded by Christopher Michael Kobielus (aka "Chris Kobe," aka Christopher Michaels). It exists to put verified facts in one place — for investigators, for reporters, and for anyone doing due diligence before sending this person money.
Also on file: an active bench warrant on a related criminal case (Exhibit D, below).
Plainly: Christopher Michael Kobielus is a criminal fugitive from justice in Orange County, California. A judge issued a warrant for his arrest, and as of the most recent record, he has not been apprehended.
On March 3, 2023, the Orange County Superior Court entered that judgment against Christopher Michael Kobielus, after he was properly served and failed to answer or appear. Default judgments are public record. This is not a criminal conviction — but it is a court's formal, on-the-record ruling that he owes this money, and he chose not to contest it.
Case No. 30-2020-01147922-CU-FR-WJC. Judgment entered by default; the court considered the plaintiff's written declaration under Code Civ. Proc. §585(d). Plaintiff identity redacted here to protect their privacy.
Handwritten annotation ties the conduct to the period between 5/31/19 and 12/15/22. Signed by Judge Walter P. Schwarm.
Plainly stated: Christopher Michael Kobielus is a criminal fugitive from justice in Orange County, California, per the court's own case status.
Case No. 22HM07720 is a criminal complaint brought by the Orange County District Attorney's office. The docket lists his case status as a bench warrant, and his release status as "Fugitive" — meaning, as of the most recent record, he did not appear as required and a warrant is outstanding.
Status: Warrant. Release status: Fugitive. Demographics on file: blue eyes, blond hair, 5'10", 190 lbs.
Violation date 08/26/2021, Section 537(a)(1) PC, arraignment heard 11/21/2022. District Attorney of record: Dustin Rice, OCDA.
A second civil fraud complaint, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court (Torrance Courthouse, Department M), describes conduct beginning in September 2024 — after the Orange County judgment had already been entered against him.
Complaint alleges Kobielus contacted the plaintiff through Instagram handle @ckobe6, describing himself as the owner of a "fund based around sports betting and a consulting business," and claiming to have been banned from roughly 90% of sportsbooks — framed to the plaintiff as evidence of his success rather than a red flag.
Plaintiff was added to a WhatsApp account under the handle "Chris Kobe," where the complaint alleges he continued describing his business and represented a second individual, named in the filing as Stassia Sittser, as his employee.
Docket shows a hearing scheduled at the Torrance Courthouse, Dept. M, on an Order to Show Cause re: Entry of Default and Default Judgment under CCP §585 — the same procedural path that produced the $277,409.35 judgment in the first case.
Filed via UniCourt public case listing. Describes initial Instagram contact and the pitch used to solicit the plaintiff.
Public dockets and prior filings show recurring conduct spanning several years — under more than one name. Items marked public record come from court dockets. Items marked reported come from individual accounts and have not yet been independently adjudicated.
Court filings tie the conduct underlying the 2023 default judgment to the period between May 31, 2019 and December 15, 2022, litigated under Case No. 30-2020-01147922-CU-FR-WJC.
Docket entry, Penal Code §537(a)(1) — a separate, minor citation. Included here only because it is part of the public docket, not because it is comparable in scale to the fraud allegations.
Lawrence Gennaro v. Christopher Kobielus, Orange County Superior Court — a residential eviction action naming him as defendant.
Individuals report being solicited to send money for sports-betting "investment" returns, under the name "Chris Kobe" and the domain chriskobe.com, with promised returns that were not paid out.
Reported to operate under at least three identities: Christopher Michael Kobielus (legal name), "Chris Kobe" (public-facing alias), and "Christopher Michaels" (named in the 2023 judgment as an alias).
After arraignment on the innkeeper-fraud misdemeanor (Case 22HM07720), the docket shows his status changed to bench warrant / fugitive. See Exhibit D.
Orange County Superior Court entered default judgment against him after he was properly served and failed to answer or appear. See Exhibit A for the full breakdown.
A second fraud complaint describes an almost identical approach to the first — a sports-betting "fund," claims of insider success, a WhatsApp handoff — this time via Instagram, roughly 18 months after the first judgment. See Exhibit E.
People who come forward about being defrauded are often talked out of reporting it, or worry they'll be dismissed. This site does not publish victim names, photos, contact information, or identifying details — anywhere, under any circumstance. The figures below are aggregate only.
Born: March 1984, per an unnamed source close to the group (reported, not document-verified) — approx. age 42 Reported hometown: Pittsburgh / Plum, PA area Eyes / Hair: Blue / Blond court record Height / Weight: 5'10" / 190 lbs court record Known aliases: Chris Kobe, Christopher Michaels, Christopher M. Kobielus Reported operating region: Originally based in Southern California (Orange County / LA); more recent activity reportedly centers on Pennsylvania, Florida, and additional states Reported current base: Redding, CA reported
Items tagged "court record" come from official case demographics on file. Age and hometown are reported by multiple sources but not independently verified against a public document — treat as a lead, not a confirmed fact, until a birth record or ID is on file.
These are identifiers he has used to solicit or receive money, as reported by multiple individuals. Publishing these — as opposed to a home address — serves a direct protective purpose: it lets someone currently being solicited recognize the pattern before they send money.
This section is intentionally narrow. It lists individuals formally named in a court document — not anyone whose name merely appears in a chat log, a payment memo, or a rumor. That's the difference between documenting a pattern and falsely accusing a bystander of a crime.
The 2024 civil complaint names a second individual, surname "Sittser," as a co-defendant — the complaint alleges Kobielus represented this person as his employee. A separately-sourced public post identifying a "Stassia Sittser" matches this surname. This site states the name because it has an actual court filing behind it — not because of any other private information.
No individual account below is attributed — this is a composite drawn from multiple, separate reports, written to show the pattern rather than any one person's story. Details that could identify a specific individual have been removed.
Contact typically starts on a personal footing — a comment, a direct message, a mutual connection — rather than an obvious sales pitch. Several accounts describe him opening with charm before any mention of money.
When a target mentions being between jobs or needing money, the pitch reportedly shifts from an investment to employment. Per the 2024 complaint: after the plaintiff said she was "interested in work," Kobielus told her "if you need to make some money I'll help you out," described having employees who lived out of state, and said he'd assist her so long as she "spoke highly of him and was not a nuisance." A job offer lowers someone's guard in a way a straight investment pitch doesn't — it reframes the relationship as employer-employee instead of stranger-with-your-money.
He reportedly describes being highly successful at sports betting — in one account, so successful he'd been "banned" from most sportsbooks — and running a fund or consulting business with "lots of employees." The framing turns red flags (bans, secrecy) into proof of skill.
Screenshots reviewed for this site show the specific prop: bet-slip images with large wager and payout figures sent directly in chat under the "Chris Kobe" handle. Individually, wins like these prove nothing; sent as a pattern to multiple targets before a money request, they function as a manufactured credibility signal rather than evidence of skill. The same conversations show a second, related tactic — casual mentions of a jet-setting lifestyle dropped alongside the bet slips:
His own words, shown here: "There are idiots out there that try to claim they do what I do... They don't... It's annoying... But I make too much money to care" — sent alongside a $30,000→$60,000 bet slip. In the same exchange, asked about returning south, he wrote he was in Vegas, then the Bahamas, "Then I have to go to Costa Rica for the resort i bought." Only his messages are shown; the other party's messages and both message dates have been redacted to protect the individual's identity.
Conversations are reportedly moved quickly to WhatsApp or similar private messaging, often under the "Chris Kobe" persona rather than his legal name — consistent across multiple, unconnected reports years apart.
Money is reportedly requested as an "investment" (sports betting fund, property purchase) or dressed as helping someone "make money," rather than as a direct loan — a framing that discourages the sender from asking for formal documentation.
Accounts describe a further layer to the deception: he reportedly asked some individuals to accept incoming transfers into their own accounts, using a cover story that the money belonged to women hiding assets from abusive spouses. In at least one account, the person didn't learn until much later that the funds were actually his — meaning she had unknowingly helped move his money while being deceived about whose it was and why. This is part of why some people connected to the case appear only as victims here, not as associates, even where money passed through their accounts: acting as a pass-through under a false story isn't the same as knowing participation.
When targets pushed back or asked for their money back, some report he responded with claims intended to make pursuit feel unsafe or futile — including describing himself as armed, and separately, claiming to travel with former secret service personnel. These claims are unverified and are not treated as fact anywhere else on this site. They're included here only because of their relevance to personal safety: anyone in contact with him, or considering contact, should weigh that such statements have reportedly been made, and route safety concerns to law enforcement rather than direct confrontation.
Multiple reports describe promised returns or repayment repeatedly delayed, then communication stopping, around the same time new solicitations were reportedly beginning elsewhere — first concentrated in Orange County, later spreading to Florida, Pennsylvania, and additional states.
Reports of solicitation attempts continue into this year. This isn't a pattern that stopped after the 2023 judgment or the criminal warrant — by these accounts, it's ongoing.
This gallery is for things that can be shown publicly without exposing a victim: court filings, public business listings, public social posts made by the accused himself, and screenshots of his own public-facing marketing. Private messages between victims — even in a group chat — don't belong here, since they routinely contain names, addresses, and identifying details.
A default judgment shows a civil court has already ruled on the money. It doesn't by itself open a criminal case. If you believe this pattern rises to criminal fraud, the fastest path to a federal review is a complaint filed directly with the FBI.
IC3.gov is the FBI's official intake for internet-enabled fraud. Multiple, independent complaints referencing the same person and pattern carry more weight than one large complaint — encourage every individual to file their own.
File at ic3.gov →For patterns spanning multiple states or a large combined dollar amount, a direct call to the field office nearest the victims can prompt faster triage than the online form alone.
Find a field office →