CK
The Kobielus File
Compiled evidence · Victim-led · For law enforcement referral
Confirmed civil judgment · $277,409.35+ owed · Public record

A documented pattern of fraud —
compiled for the record.

This site organizes public court records, sworn filings, and a growing group of individuals who allege they were defrauded by Christopher Michael Kobielus (aka "Chris Kobe," aka Christopher Michaels). It exists to put verified facts in one place — for investigators, for reporters, and for anyone doing due diligence before sending this person money.

Also on file: an active bench warrant on a related criminal case (Exhibit D, below).

$277,409.35
Total default judgment entered against defendant

Defendant
Christopher Michael Kobielus, aka Christopher Michaels
Court
Superior Court of California, County of Orange — Central Justice Center
Judge
Hon. Walter P. Schwarm
Entered
March 3, 2023
Basis
Judgment by default — defendant did not appear or contest
Statute cited
Penal Code §496(c) — civil recovery for receipt of stolen property
WARRANT · FUGITIVE
Active bench warrant on a separate criminal case

Plainly: Christopher Michael Kobielus is a criminal fugitive from justice in Orange County, California. A judge issued a warrant for his arrest, and as of the most recent record, he has not been apprehended.


Case number
22HM07720
Court
Orange County Superior Court — Harbor Justice Center, Newport Beach
Charge
PC 537(a)(1) — Defrauding an innkeeper
Prosecuting agency
Orange County District Attorney
Current status
Warrant issued — Fugitive
Join the Instagram community here @chriskobescammer → Join the Facebook community here Chris Kobe sports betting scammer →
01 Exhibit A — The Judgment

A California court has already ruled against him — ordering him to pay $277,409.35 — after he failed to show up and defend himself.

On March 3, 2023, the Orange County Superior Court entered that judgment against Christopher Michael Kobielus, after he was properly served and failed to answer or appear. Default judgments are public record. This is not a criminal conviction — but it is a court's formal, on-the-record ruling that he owes this money, and he chose not to contest it.

Judgment document, page 1 — case caption and default finding
Page 1 of 2 — Judgment (JUD-100)

Case No. 30-2020-01147922-CU-FR-WJC. Judgment entered by default; the court considered the plaintiff's written declaration under Code Civ. Proc. §585(d). Plaintiff identity redacted here to protect their privacy.

Judgment document, page 2 — damages breakdown and judge's signature
Page 2 of 2 — Damages breakdown

Handwritten annotation ties the conduct to the period between 5/31/19 and 12/15/22. Signed by Judge Walter P. Schwarm.

Damages awarded
$225,000.00
Prejudgment interest (10% annual)
$26,591.70
Attorney fees
$16,125.00
Costs
$1,881.40
Discovery sanctions
$7,811.25
Total judgment
$277,409.35
02 Exhibit D — Criminal Case & Active Warrant

This one isn't civil. It's a criminal complaint — and he's currently a fugitive from it.

Plainly stated: Christopher Michael Kobielus is a criminal fugitive from justice in Orange County, California, per the court's own case status.

Case No. 22HM07720 is a criminal complaint brought by the Orange County District Attorney's office. The docket lists his case status as a bench warrant, and his release status as "Fugitive" — meaning, as of the most recent record, he did not appear as required and a warrant is outstanding.

Case number
22HM07720
Court
Orange County Superior Court — Harbor Justice Center, Newport Beach
Prosecuting agency
Orange County District Attorney (DDA Dustin Rice)
Charge
PC 537(a)(1) — Defrauding an innkeeper, misdemeanor
Charging document
Complaint · mandatory appearance required
Arraignment
Held 11/21/2022
Current status
Warrant issued — Fugitive
Case summary showing warrant and fugitive status
Case summary — 22HM07720

Status: Warrant. Release status: Fugitive. Demographics on file: blue eyes, blond hair, 5'10", 190 lbs.

Docket entries for case 22HM07720
Docket excerpt

Violation date 08/26/2021, Section 537(a)(1) PC, arraignment heard 11/21/2022. District Attorney of record: Dustin Rice, OCDA.

Why this matters for a federal referral: an outstanding warrant on a fraud-adjacent charge, combined with a pattern of similar conduct across multiple counties, is exactly the kind of fact pattern that helps an IC3 complaint get prioritized — it shows a person actively evading one jurisdiction while reportedly still operating.
03 Exhibit E — A Second Civil Complaint (2024–present)

The pattern didn't stop after the 2023 judgment. It continued on Instagram.

A second civil fraud complaint, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court (Torrance Courthouse, Department M), describes conduct beginning in September 2024 — after the Orange County judgment had already been entered against him.

Sept 26, 2024

Initial contact via Instagram per complaint

Complaint alleges Kobielus contacted the plaintiff through Instagram handle @ckobe6, describing himself as the owner of a "fund based around sports betting and a consulting business," and claiming to have been banned from roughly 90% of sportsbooks — framed to the plaintiff as evidence of his success rather than a red flag.

Sept 2024

Moved conversation to WhatsApp per complaint

Plaintiff was added to a WhatsApp account under the handle "Chris Kobe," where the complaint alleges he continued describing his business and represented a second individual, named in the filing as Stassia Sittser, as his employee.

Scheduled Sept 2, 2026

Order to Show Cause re: default judgment public record

Docket shows a hearing scheduled at the Torrance Courthouse, Dept. M, on an Order to Show Cause re: Entry of Default and Default Judgment under CCP §585 — the same procedural path that produced the $277,409.35 judgment in the first case.

Complaint excerpt describing Instagram and WhatsApp solicitation
Complaint excerpt — operative facts, ¶¶ 7–9

Filed via UniCourt public case listing. Describes initial Instagram contact and the pitch used to solicit the plaintiff.

This complaint also names Stassia Sittser as an associate/employee — see Associates for why this site uses her full name.
04 Exhibit B — Pattern of Conduct

The 2023 judgment isn't an isolated incident. It's a pattern.

Public dockets and prior filings show recurring conduct spanning several years — under more than one name. Items marked public record come from court dockets. Items marked reported come from individual accounts and have not yet been independently adjudicated.

2021 — 2022

Underlying fraud conduct public record

Court filings tie the conduct underlying the 2023 default judgment to the period between May 31, 2019 and December 15, 2022, litigated under Case No. 30-2020-01147922-CU-FR-WJC.

Aug 26, 2021

Cited for defrauding an innkeeper public record

Docket entry, Penal Code §537(a)(1) — a separate, minor citation. Included here only because it is part of the public docket, not because it is comparable in scale to the fraud allegations.

Feb 11, 2021

Residential eviction filed against him public record

Lawrence Gennaro v. Christopher Kobielus, Orange County Superior Court — a residential eviction action naming him as defendant.

Ongoing

Operating a sports-betting "investment" solicitation reported

Individuals report being solicited to send money for sports-betting "investment" returns, under the name "Chris Kobe" and the domain chriskobe.com, with promised returns that were not paid out.

Ongoing

Use of multiple names reported

Reported to operate under at least three identities: Christopher Michael Kobielus (legal name), "Chris Kobe" (public-facing alias), and "Christopher Michaels" (named in the 2023 judgment as an alias).

Nov 21, 2022 →

Fails to appear on criminal charge; warrant issued public record

After arraignment on the innkeeper-fraud misdemeanor (Case 22HM07720), the docket shows his status changed to bench warrant / fugitive. See Exhibit D.

March 3, 2023

Default judgment entered — $277,409.35 public record

Orange County Superior Court entered default judgment against him after he was properly served and failed to answer or appear. See Exhibit A for the full breakdown.

Sept 2024 →

New solicitation, new county, same script reported

A second fraud complaint describes an almost identical approach to the first — a sports-betting "fund," claims of insider success, a WhatsApp handoff — this time via Instagram, roughly 18 months after the first judgment. See Exhibit E.

05 Exhibit C — Victim Impact

Every name below is protected. That's not an accident.

People who come forward about being defrauded are often talked out of reporting it, or worry they'll be dismissed. This site does not publish victim names, photos, contact information, or identifying details — anywhere, under any circumstance. The figures below are aggregate only.

17+
Individuals who have come forward to date — actively growing
$550,000+
Combined reported losses — actively being updated as more come forward
4+
States with reported victims: FL, CA, PA, and additional states — growing
2017–2026
Span of documented and reported conduct to date
Known identifiers — reported / on public record

Born: March 1984, per an unnamed source close to the group (reported, not document-verified) — approx. age 42 Reported hometown: Pittsburgh / Plum, PA area Eyes / Hair: Blue / Blond court record Height / Weight: 5'10" / 190 lbs court record Known aliases: Chris Kobe, Christopher Michaels, Christopher M. Kobielus Reported operating region: Originally based in Southern California (Orange County / LA); more recent activity reportedly centers on Pennsylvania, Florida, and additional states Reported current base: Redding, CA reported

Items tagged "court record" come from official case demographics on file. Age and hometown are reported by multiple sources but not independently verified against a public document — treat as a lead, not a confirmed fact, until a birth record or ID is on file.

We believe this goes back further. The earliest documented account currently on file is from 2017, but individuals close to this case believe the pattern may extend back as far as 25 years. Given that span, the group believes the true number of people affected is likely well over 100 — the 17+ above reflects only those who have been individually confirmed so far. That earlier period isn't yet documented here — if you or someone you know was affected, at any point, we'd like to hear from you.
On these numbers: this total is compiled by the group from individual accounts, not yet an independently audited figure — the honest and accurate framing is "reported," not "proven in court." That distinction matters if a journalist or investigator asks how the number was built; being able to say "here's our tracking sheet, here's how we got each figure" is what keeps this credible.
06 Exhibit F — Known Contact & Payment Identifiers

If you were contacted by any of these, you're likely not the first.

These are identifiers he has used to solicit or receive money, as reported by multiple individuals. Publishing these — as opposed to a home address — serves a direct protective purpose: it lets someone currently being solicited recognize the pattern before they send money.

Phone (WhatsApp/text)
+1 (949) 204-6410
Phone (WhatsApp, secondary)
+1 (949) 204-6515
Instagram
@ckobe6
WhatsApp display name
"Chris Kobe"
Venmo / payment display name
Chris Kobielus
PayPal username
ckobe6
Cash App $cashtag
$chriswge
Cash App $cashtag (alternate)
$sharpbetinc
Also requests
Zelle transfers (no fixed handle documented)
Business domain
chriskobe.com
He rotates accounts on purpose. In his own words, describing his banking: "I swap cards on that all day every day." Two different phone numbers have been documented so far tied to him directly — worth checking this section again, since a new handle doesn't necessarily mean a different person.
A note on secondary accounts: some funds were reportedly routed through accounts under other people's names (e.g., transfers labeled "for Kobe"). Unless a specific person has been named as a co-defendant in an actual filing, this site doesn't publish their name — being asked to relay money doesn't establish someone knew it was fraud, and we don't want to wrongly pull a bystander into this.
07 Associates Named in Court Filings

Only names with a legal filing behind them go here.

This section is intentionally narrow. It lists individuals formally named in a court document — not anyone whose name merely appears in a chat log, a payment memo, or a rumor. That's the difference between documenting a pattern and falsely accusing a bystander of a crime.

Stassia Sittser named co-defendant
Per 2024 complaint (Exhibit E)

The 2024 civil complaint names a second individual, surname "Sittser," as a co-defendant — the complaint alleges Kobielus represented this person as his employee. A separately-sourced public post identifying a "Stassia Sittser" matches this surname. This site states the name because it has an actual court filing behind it — not because of any other private information.

Money moving through a third party's account is a lead worth handing to investigators — they can subpoena bank records and determine who knew what. It is not, on its own, enough for this site to name that person publicly. If someone is later formally charged or named as a co-defendant, they'll be added here with the filing to back it up.
Independent corroboration: unrelated public consumer-complaint posts (unconnected to this group, predating it) describe the same pattern — described as personable, claims of sports-betting success, "showing photos of money," and using acquaintances as unwitting intermediaries to move funds. This matters because it isn't this group's account alone; strangers, in different years, describe the same method.
08 The Pattern, As Described By Those Targeted

Different cities, different years, the same script.

No individual account below is attributed — this is a composite drawn from multiple, separate reports, written to show the pattern rather than any one person's story. Details that could identify a specific individual have been removed.

The approach

Warm, personal, flattering — never a cold pitch

Contact typically starts on a personal footing — a comment, a direct message, a mutual connection — rather than an obvious sales pitch. Several accounts describe him opening with charm before any mention of money.

The hook

If you need work, he has a job for you per complaint

When a target mentions being between jobs or needing money, the pitch reportedly shifts from an investment to employment. Per the 2024 complaint: after the plaintiff said she was "interested in work," Kobielus told her "if you need to make some money I'll help you out," described having employees who lived out of state, and said he'd assist her so long as she "spoke highly of him and was not a nuisance." A job offer lowers someone's guard in a way a straight investment pitch doesn't — it reframes the relationship as employer-employee instead of stranger-with-your-money.

The credibility play

Claims of insider success, framed as exclusivity

He reportedly describes being highly successful at sports betting — in one account, so successful he'd been "banned" from most sportsbooks — and running a fund or consulting business with "lots of employees." The framing turns red flags (bans, secrecy) into proof of skill.

Screenshots reviewed for this site show the specific prop: bet-slip images with large wager and payout figures sent directly in chat under the "Chris Kobe" handle. Individually, wins like these prove nothing; sent as a pattern to multiple targets before a money request, they function as a manufactured credibility signal rather than evidence of skill. The same conversations show a second, related tactic — casual mentions of a jet-setting lifestyle dropped alongside the bet slips:

Chat screenshot showing bet slip and Kobielus's own messages, other party's messages and dates redacted
Victim evidence — other party's messages & dates redacted

His own words, shown here: "There are idiots out there that try to claim they do what I do... They don't... It's annoying... But I make too much money to care" — sent alongside a $30,000→$60,000 bet slip. In the same exchange, asked about returning south, he wrote he was in Vegas, then the Bahamas, "Then I have to go to Costa Rica for the resort i bought." Only his messages are shown; the other party's messages and both message dates have been redacted to protect the individual's identity.

The close relationship

Moved off-platform, fast

Conversations are reportedly moved quickly to WhatsApp or similar private messaging, often under the "Chris Kobe" persona rather than his legal name — consistent across multiple, unconnected reports years apart.

The ask

Framed as investment, opportunity, or a favor — not a loan

Money is reportedly requested as an "investment" (sports betting fund, property purchase) or dressed as helping someone "make money," rather than as a direct loan — a framing that discourages the sender from asking for formal documentation.

The unwitting mule

Some targets were reportedly asked to receive funds on his behalf — without knowing why

Accounts describe a further layer to the deception: he reportedly asked some individuals to accept incoming transfers into their own accounts, using a cover story that the money belonged to women hiding assets from abusive spouses. In at least one account, the person didn't learn until much later that the funds were actually his — meaning she had unknowingly helped move his money while being deceived about whose it was and why. This is part of why some people connected to the case appear only as victims here, not as associates, even where money passed through their accounts: acting as a pass-through under a false story isn't the same as knowing participation.

The pressure

Claims meant to discourage pursuit reported, unverified

When targets pushed back or asked for their money back, some report he responded with claims intended to make pursuit feel unsafe or futile — including describing himself as armed, and separately, claiming to travel with former secret service personnel. These claims are unverified and are not treated as fact anywhere else on this site. They're included here only because of their relevance to personal safety: anyone in contact with him, or considering contact, should weigh that such statements have reportedly been made, and route safety concerns to law enforcement rather than direct confrontation.

The stall

Delay, then silence — then a new name in a new city

Multiple reports describe promised returns or repayment repeatedly delayed, then communication stopping, around the same time new solicitations were reportedly beginning elsewhere — first concentrated in Orange County, later spreading to Florida, Pennsylvania, and additional states.

Right now

This isn't historical — the pattern has continued into this year reported

Reports of solicitation attempts continue into this year. This isn't a pattern that stopped after the 2023 judgment or the criminal warrant — by these accounts, it's ongoing.

Why this matters to an investigator: a repeated script across unconnected victims in different states is what turns a pile of individual civil disputes into a single federal wire-fraud pattern. That's the case this site is trying to help make.
10 Take Action

Documentation only matters if it reaches someone who can act on it.

A default judgment shows a civil court has already ruled on the money. It doesn't by itself open a criminal case. If you believe this pattern rises to criminal fraud, the fastest path to a federal review is a complaint filed directly with the FBI.

File with the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center

IC3.gov is the FBI's official intake for internet-enabled fraud. Multiple, independent complaints referencing the same person and pattern carry more weight than one large complaint — encourage every individual to file their own.

File at ic3.gov →

Contact your local FBI field office

For patterns spanning multiple states or a large combined dollar amount, a direct call to the field office nearest the victims can prompt faster triage than the online form alone.

Find a field office →
If you're owed money personally, a consumer-fraud or civil attorney can also advise on collecting against an existing judgment, which is a separate process from a criminal referral. This site can point you toward reporting channels, but it isn't a substitute for advice from a lawyer about your specific losses.